When
the bald-tired wheels of justice finally roll to their
conclusion, we will find out if Karl gets his. If there's
breath in the old concept of legality still, 'Bush's Brain'
should be heading to the big house for revealing classified
information to his buddies in the cheerleader press. Though
if, as many may suspect, we are living in a rough approximation
of a totalitarian banana republic, it is more likely that
Bush will reward his faux pas with a free pass to promotion.
Perhaps Queen.

Just
to keep track of the ins and outs of this Shakespearian
tale of treachery and deceit, here's a handy 'Rove
Scandal For Dummies' timeline (oldest news first) or click
here for the latest.

COULTER
SPAZZES OUT
Alan
Colmes: "If Karl Rove wasn't revealing something
secret, why did he have to speak on double super secret
background?"
Ann Coulter: "Because you don't
generally read in the press - you know - I think it was
all - you didn't see Karl Rove, I think, being quoted
on a lot of these things - but I think the point was,
umm, Clown Wilson was going around implying that he had
been sent by the CIA and reported to Dick Cheney's office...
I mean, it's amazing if you go back and read these articles
now, he uses these - you know - sort of Clintonian legally
accurate phrases..."
At last someone manages to fuse the robo-bitch's polemics circuit and, believe
it or not, it was none other than Alan 'tame Liberal' Colmes
on last night's Hannity and Colmes puppet show. (NewsHounds.us)
Even Colmes is rediscovering his tiny, vestigial Colmes balls. It truly is
the beginning of a new era...

BRIAN
KILMEADE SPEAKS
FOR AL QAEDA

When
Kilmeade talked about the London bombings as 'working
to our advantage' on F(oxymoron) News, it was the most
startlingly uncompassionate comment I ever remember hearing
on TV (Fox networks included).
Kilmeade's obnoxious theorizing could just have easily come straight from the
mouth of bin Laden himself. Why else would al Qaeda have been interested in
bombing Britain other than, as Kilmeade put it, to concentrate Tony Blair's
mind on "the number one priority of the War on Terror?" and distract
attention away from his liberal obsessions with global warming treaties and
African debt relief.
In the run-up to the 2004 election, bin
Laden rooted for a Bush second-term. Now we have lame TV sports commentators
taking pages from the al Qaeda play book. With this creepy codependency in
mind, do we need any further proof that the War on Terror is nothing more than
a mutually self-serving power struggle between two groups of religious and
political extremists? Bush and bin Laden need each other. Neocons and 'NeoIslamists'
exist to validate each other's world domination plans. The rest of us are just
caught in the fallout.
Whether you're the man-in-the-street in Kansas or the man-in-the-casbah in
Cairo, you have nothing to gain by pledging support to either head of the same
war pig except more bloodshed and paranoia. All Kilmeade has done is further
validate the murderous bullshit and egregiously offend our supposed allies
in Britain. What next? Post-game sports analysis from Osama bin Laden?
ROVE
SCANDAL FOR DUMMIES

February
2002: SADDAM BUYS URANIUM?
CIA
envoy and former US ambassador to Gabon, Joseph
Wilson, dispatched to Niger, West Africa to explore claims
that Iraq had bought 'Yellow Cake' uranium from Niger to
use in the development of nuclear weapons. (NucNews.com)
March 2002: URANIUM CLAIMS BOGUS
The
CIA informs the Bush government that the uranium story has
no factual basis. The
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection
team in Iraq concludes that the evidence relating to the
uranium sale was faked. (NucNews.com)
September, 2002: JUDITH MILLER: PRESS WHORE FOR WAR
Steadfastly
refusing to be put off-message by contradictory evidence, Judith
Miller pulls a scary exposé about Iraqi WMDs out
of her ass in the New York Times. She raves: "[Iraq
had] stepped up its quest for nuclear weapons and has embarked
on a worldwide hunt for materials to make an atomic bomb." Rice,
Powell and Rumsfeld all later reference Miller's bogus articles
when selling the Iraq war. (Wikipedia.org)
January, 2003: POTUS LIES TO THE NATION?
In
his 2003
State of the Union Address, Bush plugs the long-dud Iraqi
uranium story to back up his assertion that Saddam is developing
nuclear weapons and must be stopped. "The British government
has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant
quantities of uranium from Africa."
"The CIA warned the US Government that claims about Iraq's nuclear ambitions
were not true months before President Bush used them to make his case for war,
the BBC has learned. [T]he CIA official has said that a former US diplomat had
already established the claim was false in March 2002 - and that the information
had been passed on to the government departments, including the White House,
well before Mr Bush mentioned it in the speech." (White
House 'warned over Iraqi claim', BBC News)
March, 2003: OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM BEGINS
The
war in Iraq begins with claims about Saddam's weapons of
mass destruction still cited as a primary justification.
(Iraq
War Begins, PBS.org)
July 6, 2003: JOSEPH WILSON SPEAKS UP
Wilson
writes an opinion piece in The New York Times claiming the
Bush administration had twisted intelligence to exaggerate
the threat posed by Iraq in the lead up to the invasion.
He pointed out that evidence cited by Bush in his State of
the Union address was false and that the government had known
this for up to a year. ("What
I didn't find in Africa", Joseph C. Wilson 4th)
July 14, 2003: NOVAK DOES THE DIRTY DEED
Blow-hard
Washington Post columnist Robert
Novak writes an opinion piece that seeks to trash Wilson's
preceding article. He also blows his wife's cover as a CIA
operative of 26 years standing thus committing a federal
crime. As a consequence of Novak's article, Valerie
Plame's team of 70 overseas assets are instantly rendered
useless and stood down. This transgression is widely perceived
as government payback for Wilson's continued public contradiction
of the Bush line. ("Mission
to Niger", Robert Novak)
July, 2003: BRITISH WEAPONS INSPECTOR OFFED
Dr
David Kelly, head of the British weapons inspectors
in Iraq, is found dead in suspicious circumstances. He
had previously leaked information on Bush/Blair's reliance
on such false evidence as the Iraqi uranium deal to justify
the invasion of Iraq. ("Death
deals devastating blow to Iraq arms hunt", The Observer)
August 29, 2003: WILSON ACCUSES ROVE OF LEAK
Wilson
identifies Karl Rove as the source of the leak to the Washington
Post. "At the end of the day, it's of keen interest
to me to see whether or not we can get Karl Rove frog-marched
out of the White House in handcuffs. And trust me, when I
use that name, I measure my words." (Wikinews.org)
September,
2003: SPOOKS DEMAND INVESTIGATION
The
CIA asks the Justice Department to investigate allegations
that the White House broke federal laws by revealing the
identity of one of its undercover employees. (CommonDreams.org)
September 30, 2003: BUSH LAYS DOWN THE LAW
As
the Justice Department initiates a full-scale criminal inquiry,
the White House announced that Rove had denied involvement
and asserted that Wilson's allegations are "simply not
true." Presidential spokesman Scott McClellan pledged
the White House's cooperation with the Department of Justice
and suggested anyone involved in the leak would be fired.
(NYTimes.com)
October 7, 2003: WHITE HOUSE DENIES ROVE IS SOURCE
The
White House firmly ruled out any role by administration officials
in the leak. McClellan said it was "ridiculous" to
suggest that Rove was involved. "The president knows
he wasn't involved." Bush announces "Leaks of classified
information are bad things. We’ve got too much leaking
in Washington, I want to know who the leakers are." (FoxNews.com)
October, 2003: PLAME GOES PUBLIC
Valerie
Plame goes public for the first time since having her
cover blown when she attends a Washington luncheon where
her husband is awarded a $10,000 "truth-telling" prize
by the
Nation Institute. (CommonDreams.org)
January 22, 2004: COURT IN SESSION
A
federal grand jury begins hearing testimony in the investigation
into the leak. (TalkLeft.com)
May 26, 2004: MILLER TRASHED
A
New York Times editorial acknowledges "information that
was controversial [was] allowed to stand unchallenged." during
the run up to the Iraq war. The editorial refused to place "blame
on individual reporters," but it was noted that ten
of the twelve flawed stories discussed had been written or
co-written by Judith
Miller. (ANOCA.org)
June, 2005: BUSH CALLS HIS LAWYER
After
witnesses testify to the grand jury that Bush knew about
and took no action to stop the release of a covert operative's
name, Bush makes a 'just in case' call to attorney James
E. Sharp to enlist his representation in any future court
action. (San
Diego Union Tribune) Some of Sharp's previous clients
include Maj.
Gen. Richard V. Secord, a major figure in the Iran-Contra
scandal who helped Lt. Col. Oliver North accumulate untaxed
millions in overseas accounts and his self-avowed “good
friend” Joe
Harry Pegg convicted of conspiring to import marijuana
during the 1980s. (RawStory.com)
October 15, 2004: ROVE IN COURT
Rove
testifies before a federal grand jury trying to determine
the source of the leak. John Kerry's senior adviser Joe Lockhart
issues a statement calling on Rove and other aides to 'come
clean about their role in this insidious act.' (Democrats.com)
June 29, 2005: JUDGE GETS TOUGH
Matthew
Cooper of Time magazine and Judith Miller held in contempt
of court and threatened with imprisonment for refusing to
disclose secret sources in their stories connecting the White
House with Valerie Plame's outing. U.S. Federal judge Thomas
F. Hogan gave Miller and Cooper one week to reveal their
sources or face 18 months in prison. (PenUSA.org)
July 4, 2005: ROVE'S LAWYER SPEAKS
Attorney
Robert Luskin (career milestone: defending
a convicted money launderer who payed his fee with gold
bars, thus piqueing the curiousity of the IRS) confirmed
that Cooper had called Rove in July 2003 but insisted that
his client did not disclose any confidential information.
(CNN.com)
July 6, 2005: MILLER GETS HERS
Miller
is sentenced to Maximum Security Prison in Washington, D.C.
for refusing to comply. Cooper spared at the last minute
after his source gave him the go-ahead to name names. (MediaWeek.com)
Says Miller: "Ms. Miller joined my wife, Valerie, and
her 20 years of service to this nation as collateral damage
in the smear campaign launched when I had the temerity to
challenge the president on his assertion that Iraq had attempted
to purchase uranium yellowcake from Africa." (LibertyPost.org)
July 10, 2005: ROVE OUTED AT LAST
Newsweek
publishes details of an email sent by Cooper to his bureau
chief dated three days prior to Novak's 2003 exposure of
Plame. Cooper wrote that he had spoken to Rove on "double
super secret background" and that Rove had told him
that former Ambassador Joseph Wilson's "wife...apparently
works at the agency on WMD issues." (MSNBC.com)
July 11, 2005: NO COMMENT
Several
reporters (apparently rediscovering their job descriptions)
round on Scott McClellan at a monday White House press conference
and demand to know the facts. The official line is total
evasion - to the extent that McClellan gives a curt 'no comment'
when asked if Bush still has confidence in Rove. (RawStory.com)
July 12, 2005: ROVE FORMERLY REVEALED AS SOURCE
Cooper
confirms to a grand jury that Karl Rove was his source. "Today
I testified and agreed to testify solely because of a waiver
I received from my source," Cooper said outside the
courthouse. "Once a journalist makes a commitment of
confidentiality to a source, only the source can end that
commitment." (Fox
News)
On the same day, the GOP regroups and releases a bulleted list of 'talking
points.' The spin is that Rove only tried to prevent his press contact from
leaking Plame's identity. They also make a big deal about the confusion over
who sent Joseph Wilson to Niger to begin with and try to make Wilson out to
be a liar. (RawStory.com)
Rove's defenders claim that Wilson told the world he was sent to Niger at the
behest of Dick Cheney when, in reality, he had been sent by his wife. Both
talking point claims are untrue as Wilson had never claimed to have acted on
orders from big Dick and it was the CIA's Directorate of Operations, Counterproliferation
Division (CPD) that sent him to Niger, not Valerie Plame. After the previous
day's confusion, the Republican line now presents saintly Rove as the hapless
victim of a partisan liberal attack orchestrated by the DNC and MoveOn.org.
(MediaMatters.org)
July 13, 2005: BUSH'S HONESTY RATING DENTED
Only
41 percent [of respondents] give Bush good marks for being "honest
and straightforward" — his lowest ranking on this
question since he became president. (MSNBC.com)
July 14, 2005: WILSON WEIGHS IN
'Today'
speaks to Joseph Wilson: "It's now public that President
Bush's top adviser, Karl Rove, did talk to at least one reporter
about your wife. But Rove insists he never used her name
and that he did not know that she was undercover."
Wilson responds: "My wife's name is Wilson. It is Mrs. Joseph Wilson.
It is Valerie Wilson. And he named her. He identified her. So that argument
I don't believe stands the smell test...The president said he would fire anybody
who was caught leaking in this matter. Karl Rove has now been caught. The president
has said repeatedly, I am a man of my word. The president really should stand
up and prove to the American people that his word is his bond and fire Karl
Rove." (MSNBC.com)
On the same day, Democrats demand legislation be implemented to 'deny security
clearances to officials who unmask undercover agents' and get slammed for partisan
activism. Yup, to ask that your government does not betray it's own undercover
operatives is now deemed crazy liberalism. (NYTimes.com)
July 15, 2005: BUSH STANDS BY HIS MAN
Bush,
often characterized as loyal to a fault, publicly backs Rove.
Rove's attorney sticks with the logic-bending defense that
he did not refer to Plame or the CIA by name and that Rove's
statement 'Joseph Wilson's wife works for the agency' therefore
did not constitute an illegal breach of secrecy. He also
deflects blame by insisting that Rove learned about Plame
from Novak, not vice versa. (story
at CBS5.com)
July
16, 2005: SECURITY AMENDMENT KICKED OUT BY CONS
Conservative
commentators were quick to seize on Democrat calls to tighten
up the disclosure laws as evidence of partisan activism.
Just to prove that the Republicans are above all that, the
amendment was voted down by the majority Republican House.
The measure simply sought to prevent access to classified
information by federal employees guilty of leaking said information
to unauthorized sources. Them crazy liberal bastards. (WorldForum.org)
July 17, 2005: GOP STANDS BEHIND ROVE
Republican
National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman, who once worked
for Rove, declares: "The fact is, Karl Rove did not
leak classified information." Senate Majority Leader
Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) calls the controversy "a nonstory." (LATimes.com)
But, even if Rove was not the source, as the GOP are insisting,
and actually heard the story first from Matt Cooper, he is
still on record as saying 'I heard that too' when he was
told who Wilson's wife was. Not only is leaking classified
information in breach of the 'Classified Information Nondisclosure
Agreement' (SF-312) that all White House staff are required
to sign, confirming previously revealed classified information
is also a breach of security. The wording of the nondisclosure
agreement is pretty unambiguous: "Before confirming
the accuracy of what appears in the public source, the signer
of the SF-312 must confirm through an authorized official
that the information has, in fact, been declassified. If
it has not, confirmation of its accuracy is also an unauthorized
disclosure." (yubanet.com)
July18, 2005: COOPER BLAMES ROVE, BUSH BACKTRACKS
Even
if Novak told Rove and not vice-versa, Matt Cooper still
insisted that it was Rove who told him about Valerie Plame. "After
that conversation [with Rove] I knew she worked at the CIA
and worked on WMD [weapons of mass destruction]," said
Cooper.
Bush backtracks on his prior statement that anyone involved with leaking classified
information would be fired. He now says: "If someone committed a crime,
they will no longer work in my administration." (CBC
News) Seems like Bush is betting on Rove getting a slap on the wrist without
any specific criminal charge being applied.
July19, 2005: MOVEON.ORG LAUNCHES TV CAMPAIGN
MoveOn.org
releases a TV ad calling on the President to keep his
word and fire his top political advisor Karl Rove for disclosing
the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson.
July 20, 2005: PUBLIC OPINION AGAINST ROVE. SO WHAT?
71
percent of Republicans in an ABC News national poll believed
Rove should be fired for being the leaker (83 percent of
Democrats) and only 25 percent of the public believed President
Bush is cooperating with the investigation. Democracy in
inaction?
July 22, 2005: MORE PRESSURE ON BUSH
"I
wouldn't be here this morning if President Bush had done
the one thing required of him as commander in chief - protect
and defend the Constitution," said Larry Johnson, a
former CIA analyst at a hearing organized by the Democrats. "The
minute that Valerie Plame's identity was outed, he should
have delivered a strict and strong message to his employees." Johnson,
a registered Republican, said he wished GOP lawmakers would
have the courage to stand up. "Where are these men and
women with any integrity to speak out against this? I expect
better behavior out of Republicans." (Washington
Post)
August 1, 2005: BUSH BLOWS HARD
"Karl’s
got my complete confidence. He’s a valuable member
of my team," Bush said in his strongest defence yet
of Rove. (MediaChannel.org)
August 13, 2005: BRING ON ASHCROFT
The
fact that Rove lied to FBI investigators in 2003, insisting
that he never discussed Plame with Matthew Cooper, now raises
the issue of Attorney General John Ashcroft's complicity
in the affair as the guy in charge who originally let Rove
off the hook.
Rove previously served as an Ashcroft adviser and had fiercely advocated for
his appointment as Attorney General. Rove's company also earned more than $746,000
for services rendered. John Conyers, the current ranking Democrat on the House
Judiciary Committee, is calling for an investigation into Ashcroft's role in
the leak.
According to Conyers: "There has long been the appearance of impropriety
in Ashcroft's handling of this investigation. The former attorney general had
well documented conflicts of interest in this matter, particularly with regard
to his personal relationship with Karl Rove....Pursuant to standard rules of
legal ethics, and explicit rules on conflict of interest, those facts alone
should have dictated his immediate recusal." (VillageVoice.com)

GREAT
PIONEERS OF NEOCON THOUGHT #12
"Don't
get the idea I'm one of those goddam radicals.
Don't get the idea I'm knocking the American system."
Alphonse
Capone

Back
Pages
Fried
Wire Policy and Disclaimer | Hatemail | Hmm... | Fanmail |