 |
Current (Archived: March 2008 | February 2008 | January
2008 | December
2007 | November
2007 | October
2007 | September 2007 | August
2007 | July 2007 | June
2007 | May 2007 | April
2007 | March
2007 | February 2007 | January
2007 | December 2006 | November
2006 | October 2006 | September
2006 | August 2006 | July
2006 | June 2006 | May
2006 | April
2006 | March 2006 | January-February
2006 | November-December 2005 | August-October
2005 | June-July 2005 | January-May
2005 | 2004
JAPAN:
FREAKING NUTS?
March
20, 2008
"Through
my cartoons, I hope to convey to people abroad what ordinary
Japanese people think, our lifestyles and what kind of
future we want to build." Doraemon, cartoon robot
cat and "anime
ambassador"

Japanese
Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura appointed Doraemon, cartoon
robot cat, "anime ambassador," at an official
inauguration ceremony today. "Doraemon, I hope you
will travel around the world as an anime ambassador to
deepen people's understanding of Japan so they will become
friends with Japan," Komura told the blue-and-white
cat.
Astro Boy, another cartoon icon, was named last November
as ambassador
for overseas safety.
But don't get all cocky, Japan. Appointing cartoon character
ambassadors is nothing new. We beat you to that punch with
John Bolton. (Link
to this)
MSM
SPIN FOR McBUSH
March
20, 2008
Q:
When does an idiotic statement with potentially disastrous
international repercussions that exposes you as a
woefully inadequate presidential prospect constitute
a 'gaffe'?
A: When the MSM is on your side. Good work, news media!
McBush's
recent ravings over the non-existent connection between
Iran and al Qaeda is possibly the most pathetic thing I've
seen on TV since NBC screened trailers for the second season
of "Joey". McBush, the great "experienced
one" and self-styled foreign policy expert, has shown
himself up as a clueless dipwad and a presidential disaster
in the making. Or at least he would have done had not our
loyal MSM done some pretty quick damage limitation on his
behalf.
The standard clip has seen a lot of play on the news
networks and it's usually referred to as a 'gaffe' - thereby
implying
an innocent malapropism and no foul for McBush. For example,
beardy sleep-aid Wolf Blitzer said that McBush "quickly
corrected [himself] after some prodding from his Senate colleague,
Joe Lieberman." And,
if you watch the standard version of McBush's speech, it
does appear that he addressed his 'gaffe' as lickety-split
as a septuagenarian with a life spent basting in the Arizona
sun might be expected to.
But go
watch the unedited version of the press conference instead.
You'll notice that McBush's brain fart hangs in the air for
more than 60 awkward seconds before Lieberman
- not McCain - corrects it. This means his statement was
delivered
confidently without pause or second thought and that McBush
was blissfully unaware he had been talking errant crap.
So let's dispense with the harmless-sounding term 'gaffe'
and consider the scary reality of McBush's brain fart: it's
staggering length. This wasn't just a fart, it was a lengthy
expulsion of noxious mind gas that suggested his brain had
been gorging on tainted burritos and sulphur-enriched broccoli
juice for days beforehand. So instead of saying "John
McCain quickly corrected his gaffe", wouldn't it be
more accurate to say "John
McCain made a dumb statement and Joe Lieberman corrected
him [much] later?"
It's not just semantics. There is a world of difference between
making a verbal slip,
as the MSM would have you believe this was, and being an
ill-informed old twat who doesn't know what the fuck he's
talking about but still thinks he has what it takes to
be Commander-in-Chief. (Link
to this)

OFF
HIS MEDS?
March
19, 2008
Dick
Cheney: Iraq
going great, asbestos cures cancer and Amy
Winehouse is f**kable.
Sometimes
people say stuff that is so far removed from actuality,
it almost constitutes self-parody. Dick Cheney was recently
defrosted in Baghdad and plugged in to make a statement
that soars like a retarded eagle with a jet pack beyond
ridiculousness into some far-flung stratosphere of f**king
stupid:
"If
you look back on those five years it has been a difficult,
challenging but nonetheless successful endeavour ... and
it has been well worth the effort."
Soon
after he spoke, an almost inevitable suicide bombing
killed 32 people near a mosque in the city of Kerbala,
south of
Baghdad.
Just one
more small success..?
With "a
third of Iraqis displaced, in need of emergency aid or
dead" how can anyone argue with Cheney's astute assessment?
And
with 4,000 of our troops killed, an economy in recession
and the Iraqi 'government' looking about as keen to assume
the
reigns
of power as our Democratic party at home, who could be churlish
enough
to
say "hang
on there Mr Cheney, aren't you, like, totally full of s**t?" (Link
to this)
PASSING
THE DICK TEST
March
19, 2008
"Be
not afraid of greatness; some are born great, some achieve
greatness, and others have greatness thrust upon them." William
Shakespeare

A
lot of people these days are wrestling with their cynicism
over Barack Obama. They like him and suspect he'd make
one of the greatest presidents
ever. But then they go second-guessing themselves and fear
they've been slickly conned by the political equivalent
of the Maroon Buick Salesman of the Month. It's a tricky
one to be sure... but a simple test to determine Obama's
genuineness
exists: let's call it the Dick Test.
Cynical people such as myself (i.e., dicks) have long been
convinced by the logical conundrum that anyone who actually wants to
lead this country should automatically be barred from doing
so for the sake of the common good. We are sick of
the self-serving orgy that our electoral process has become
and
we're sick
of egomaniacs treating the White House as some kind of personal
goal or lucrative retirement plan. Underneath our
sarcasm and bitterness, we dicks genuinely crave a candidate
who reflects those old principles of duty,
service, selflessness and statesmanship (i.e., greatness).
But so many of the poltroons and bozos running for office
these days represent nothing
of
those
ideals. Maybe if Shakespeare were around, he might
be inspired by our Clintons and McBushes to add a fourth
condition of greatness: "Some drive us freaking nuts
thrusting their non-existent greatness upon us."
But Obama? Even though his opponents may try to persuade
you he's just some kind of Rasputin who's
managed to enthrall us dumb sluts with his fancy talk,
don't
believe
it. Us dicks like him too and we are not so easily distracted
by bright, shiny objects. He passes our test with flying
colors because he is the first candidate we can remember
who is actually worth a shit and who embodies the statesman-like
values other candidates only fake with varying
degrees
of success.
The Dick Test also gauges
how inclined the subject is to respond to dickishness in
kind and therefore fail miserably to look like a statesmen.
But, Jeez,
this guy responds to Clinton's cheap shots about
the 'hateful' Reverend Wright by delivering one of the finest
and most sincere speeches since the Gettysburg Address. Wow.
Look at Clinton and McBush... then listen to the "More
Perfect Union" speech. In political terms,
it's like Tiger Woods just strolled onto the put-put course
to tackle the windmill. It's almost as if Clinton's
cheap shots have "thrust greatness upon him" by
giving him a great opportunity to cataclysmically outclass
her and pass the Dick Test with flying colors.
So if you're one of those doubters who want to support Obama
but worry that you're being duped, I'd say just go for it.
Barack Obama is 100% Dick Test certified.
Epilogue:
Fried Wire recently signed on at Clinton's Web site so I
could leave some negative comments on her Stepford Wives-style
blog. Now I must be on the mailing list as a supporter
(he
he
he).
To compare
and contrast with Obama's style, let me share with you this
email I just got from the Clinton campaign:

There may be a competition going on, but has any candidate
ever shown such mean-spirited dickishness to a candidate
in the same damned party during a primary? How sad it
is that they wheel out the old "we can't let
that happen" call
to action usually reserved for talking about George Bush's
latest proposed affront to humanity and reason? What
the hell is wrong with the Clintons???
But, even now, there still exists one way for Hillary
Clinton to up her Dick Test zero-average. She's
gone too
far along the trail of ego-fueled, Kamikaze-like insanity
to ever pass, but she could go some way to redeeming
herself
if she'd just step the hell down and help Obama win.
Perhaps even a C minus would be in order? (Link
to this)

SCREW
HILLARY 2012
March
13, 2008
Let
me be first to say it... It's
the end of the world AND
Hillary Clinton's running again. How much worse can
2012 get?
Even
by the stomach-churningly nasty standards
of American electioneering, Hillary Clinton is behaving
like
an off-the-scale bitch. She has demonstrated she doesn't
give a damn about the American people, the Democratic base
or anything other
than her own obsessive pursuit of power. With the tenacity
and viciousness of a cornered sewer rat, she's done more
to
turn off voters
and destroy her own party than would have previously been
thought possible. Why?
"Could
it be that a preferable outcome would be that she engages
in a campaign of total personal destruction of her Democratic
opponent, in the hope of electing a Republican who would
be a one-term president because of considerable age, allowing
Hillary to run in 2012?" (Brent
Budowsky)
"How else can you explain her latest trend of endorsing
McCain? She's not stupid enough to think those comments won't
be used against Obama v McCain. I can think of no other reason.
She wants Obama to lose so she doesn't have to wait 8 years." (Democratic
Underground)
"The only rationale I can think of for the way the Clintons
are now campaigning is that they are running for 2012. They
want McCain to win, if they can't. Why else be this self-destructive?" (Andrew
Sullivan)
Although
I long suspected Clinton was angling for a McCain veep
gig (or vice-versa), I must confess to feeling a little
retarded for not having figured out the nauseating scenario
illustrated above. Man, those Rovian scorched-earth election
tactics of yesteryear are starting to look cute
compared with the brutal machinations of the Clinton campaign.
At least Rove served his own party at election time and
only colluded in betraying it's base after the
election was won. Anyone who gives a damn about the future
of this country
can only hope Clinton's kamikaze campaign
implodes pretty soon.
And why are the DNC sitting
idly by and letting this horror unfold? Have all those years
of defeatist masochism brought them to the point where they
can't even imagine a Dem beating a Bush-appointed loser like
McCain and have given up on Obama? Worse-than-useless
dullards. 'Shame' does not even begin to sum up the situation.
(Link to this)
LET
THEM EAT CAKE
March
13, 2008
"President
George W. Bush joins Arizona Senator John McCain in a
small celebration of McCain's 69th birthday Monday, Aug.
29, 2005, after the President's arrival at Luke Air Force
Base near Phoenix." (whitehouse.gov)

What
else was happening on August 29, 2005? Nothing much...
"Hurricane
Katrina, a powerful Category 4 storm packing 145-mph winds,
slammed into the coast of Louisiana Monday morning,
bringing torrential rains, spawning possible tornadoes
and threatening devastation to the cities of New Orleans
and
Biloxi... The gigantic storm, which as it made landfall
was roughly the size of the state of Florida, roared ashore
near
the coastal town of Buras, La. just after 7 a.m. EDT.
With a grim plea of "God bless us", New Orleans's
mayor had ordered a mandatory evacuation of the nearly
half-million residents ahead of a massive hurricane that
threatened to
devastate the low-lying city early Sunday. "We are
facing a storm that most of us have long feared," Mayor
C. Ray Nagin said Sunday in ordering people out. "This
is a once-in-a-lifetime event."
"Once-in-a-lifetime
event"? Jeez
Ray, you party pooper, so's McBush's 69th birthday.
(Link to this)
WE
ARE THE ROBOTS
March
13, 2008
"During
a national TV interview Tuesday, Romney said he would
be 'honored' to be selected by the Arizona
senator." - Romney
on McBush

McBush
and Fonz's Dad? 'Nightmare' seems too lively a word,
but it sure as hell would be the opposite of a 'Dream Ticket'
if Romney does run with 2008's hot young GOP hopeful
and part-time Kraftwerk impersonator. Imagine those rallies...
the crowd excitement of a 4-hour timeshare seminar combined
with the kind of adrenalin rush usually associated
with watching the farming news report. Man, I can hardly
wait!
(Link
to this)
NON-REPUBLICAN
SLEAZEBALL SHOCKER
March
13, 2008
"We
know there is one person who can bring us back, one person
who has the vision, the courage, the guts to say what
has to be said, to stand up to those interests who do
not like to be stood up to." - Eliot
Spitzer on (cheap snigger...) Hillary Clinton
I'm
still reeling from the horror and surprise I experienced
on Monday when I first realized Spitzer was not a Republican.
But at least I can allow myself an almost as large a sneer
now I know he's a Clinton Democrat. (Link
to this)
McBUSH & THE
NUTJOBS
March
12, 2008
McCain
continues his awkward flirtation with the American Taliban.
But is it worth it?
Senator
McBush has hailed as a spiritual adviser an Ohio megachurch
pastor who has called upon Christians to wage
a "war" against
the "false religion" of Islam with the aim
of destroying it. Televangelist Rod Parsley, who refers
to
himself as a "Christocrat", claims that Islam
is an "anti-Christ religion" predicated on deception. (Kinda
like Neoconservative Republicanism)
Although Parsley is credited with helping Bush win Ohio in
2004 by sending his flock out to vote for him, the evangelical/Christian
fascist demographic is now no longer the force it used to
be. Too many Jeezuzlanders feel betrayed by Bushco and are
fast losing interest in who gets to govern the earthly realm.
This time around, it's hard to imagine many of them bothering
to saddle up their horse and buggies to go vote for a guy
endorsed by Bush - even with the urging
of their nutjob pastors.
So it'll be interesting to see if McBush seeks to disassociate
himself from this kind of twisted bullshit in the interests
of at least appearing to represent America's
estimated 6-7 million Muslims. Or does the president now
get to pick and choose which citizens to represent? Isn't
that like... err... unconstitutional?
It's amazing that anyone even votes Republican any more.
After working so hard to alienate such sizeable segments
of our society as black people (campaign debate snubs and
race-based Obama attacks),
gays
(all that
stigmatizing and hypocricy), latinos (let's build a big fence),
Muslims (well, you know...), the American middle class (read:
tent-city dwelling class) and now evangelicals (thanks for
the vote, let's keep killing fetuses), who the hell is left
to vote for these clowns anyway?
Or perhaps Republican voters are the living embodiment of
Groucho Marx's quip about not wanting to belong to any club
that would have him as a member. (Link
to this)

THE
CONTINUING UNRAVELING OF AMERICA'S FIRST BLACK FIRST LADY
March
12, 2008
Go
Clinton. In the name of God, just go... please!
I'm
a big connoisseur of irony. And the Clinton kamikaze campaign
is chock-full of the stuff. How ironic, for example, that
most non-wingnuts have spent the past 8-years fondly remembering
the Bill Clinton era and wishing he could come back and
save us from Bush like some kind of trouserless
Golem. But now we have a chance to elect his missus and
have him back in the WH, they're coming off more like same
old, same old and turning us off faster than a Rosie O'Donnell
sex tape.
It's ironic too that the much-vaunted Clintonian penchant
for chicanery and ruthless tactics turns out to be
a crock too. After all, what is all that hinting about a
joint ticket with Obama but a public admission that you ain't
gonna win? You'd think they'd play their cards closer to
their chest than that.
Imagine too the irony of "America's First Black First
Lady" now fronting a timewarp campaign that seems more
designed to appeal to pre-civil rights Southern Democrats
than disgruntled contemporary liberals. In Mississippi, Obama
won nine out of ten black votes. Not exactly a ringing
endorsement for America's First Black First Lady. And then,
as if the Clintons weren't looking overly Caucasian enough,
along comes Geraldine Ferraro...
Ferraro
is standing by her recent squalid comment that Barack
Obama is "only
where he is because he's black." Ferraro,
DNC high-flier (ran with Mondale in 1984)
and senior Clinton team member, is instead trying to pass
off her racist slight as a compliment. Hmm... This must
be
some kind of new political manners I know nothing of. When
your candidate is being trounced, it's more usual not to
start saying nice things about your opponent. But what
do I know?
But you don't survive 300 years in politics without thinking
about what you say. Ferraro knows damn well her comment was
intended as a coded call to action for those mean-spirited
jerks who rail against quotas and affirmative action because
they believe black people are otherwise genetically incapable
of achieving success.
Do Clinton voters really believe Obama is some kind of token
candidate being allowed a free pass, irrespective of his
merits, only because he's black? Of course Ferraro and Clinton
are not stupid. But they're betting that a lot of potential
voters in the upcoming 'must-win' Pennsylvania primary are.
Clinton strategist James Carville once described Pennsylvania
as Philadelphia in the east, Pittsburgh to the west and Alabama
in the middle. What better time for Clinton to ramp up the
subtle racism. Sad, sad, sad. (Link
to this)

MONDAY
MORNING LAUGHS
March
10, 2008
Call
me a sick, unsympathetic SOB, but I think
it's possible to get a laugh from almost any unlikely
situation. Killing sprees, Hillary Clinton and comedy
wingnuts can all yield a titter.

Steve
King: the funniest thing out of Iowa since... err...
Killing
sprees not
funny? How about if the shooter goes by the name of Weenus
Chumkamnerd? How about if he was inspired
to shoot dead eight of his neighbors after "tiring
of their karaoke versions of popular songs, including John
Denver’s Country Roads"? If you ain't at least
smirking, you must be deader inside than one of Weenus'
neighbors.
How
about Clinton? How about the girl from Hillary Clinton's
lame but depressingly effective "3 a.m." ad being
interviewed on TV and voicing
her dislike of the ad and her support for Obama?
"What I don't like about the ad is its fear-mongering," Casey
Knowles, now 18, told Good Morning America on Sunday. "I
think it's a cheap hit to take. I really prefer Obama's message
of looking forward to a bright future." Ha!
For one final
snicker, let's ruminate on this zinger from Steve King, satirist
and Republican Representative from Iowa: "I
will tell you that, if [Obama] is elected president, then
the Al-Qaeda, the radical Islamists and their supporters,
will be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they
did on September 11 because they will declare victory in
this war on terror." Good one Steve...
Really, you have to laugh at King because not to do so would
beg uncomfortable questions like "why is this embarrassing
disgrace to human intelligence (even in Iowa) not
asked to resign?" You know King must be
playing it for laughs. (Link to this)

LIAR
LIAR PANT(SUIT) ON FIRE
March
7, 2008
Go
Clinton. In the name of God, just go... please!
Clinton
is now showing she can lie and self-aggrandize with the
best worst of them. It's almost as if she's a Republican.
Andrew Sullivan, everyone's favorite bald catholic homosexual
conservative, refers us to a Chicago Tribune article that
refutes some of her
most massively stupid
claims
about
her
own experience
and achievements:
"Pressed
in a CNN interview this week for specific examples of foreign
policy experience that has prepared her for an
international crisis, Clinton claimed that she "helped
to bring peace" to Northern Ireland and negotiated
with Macedonia to open up its border to refugees from Kosovo."
Brought
peace to Northern Ireland??? Err... right, of course
you did, Hillary. And with reference to Macedonia, the
article points out
that "The
Macedonian government opened its border to refugees the
day before Clinton
arrived to
meet with government leaders."
Sullivan adds that Clinton has "no executive experience.
She has less legislative experience than Obama. And
she has not just exaggerated, but flat-out lied, about
her non-achievements." Pass that to a Hillary supporter.
Obama is ahead on the popular vote and on pledged delegates.
If the DNC does have some kind of self-destructive brain
fart and, via those 'Super delegates',
passes
the torch to this divisive, egomaniacal, fraudulent, irrelevant
and outmoded shyster it might just be the saddest day for
democracy since the call-off of the Florida recount. (Link
to this)
BUNCH
OF C***S!
March
7,
2008
How
do you undermine the success of a candidate who
is inconveniently popular? Simple. Deploy the "C" word...
Google
yields 539,000 hits for the keywords 'Obama, cult' (E.G., "The
Obama Cult of Nonthreatening Personality", "The
Mystery of the Obama Cult", "The Obama Cult:
Both Ugly And Beautiful").
Don't these 539,000 jerkwads understand the implications
of using such a lazy, catch-all slur? Don't
they worry there might be repercussions in dismissing the
millions of voters backing America's most
popular
candidate
as a bunch
of beguiled and delusional
airheads? Hopefully, the tactic will backfire and generate
further lost credibility for themselves and their
brand of screechy news-o-tainment. They're not taking potshots
at a few voiceless wackjobs when they toss around the 'c'
word, they're picking on what currently constitutes a majority
of American
people. So brave (or stupid) words indeed.
There's a lot
of us "Obama cultists" out here and our brains-to-candidate
ratio is pretty impressive. The media Obama-haters would
be better off insulting Clinton's base of black-hating 'rojonecks'
or McCain's base of everybody-hating crackers than trifling
with America's intelligentsia
who have thrown in their lot with Obama. Am I going too
far? Well, do you know anyone in sound mind
and
without party agenda who would genuinely prefer
Clinton or, God forbid, McBush over Obama for president?
(OK... maybe I've gone too far. Boasting about smarts is
distinctly unAmerican these days. Let's get back to the cult
issue before my email firing squad suggests
another one-way ticket to France where gross stuff like
escargot, hirsute underarms and thinking are appreciated.)
The 'C' Word continued...
Perhaps that old aphorism about
history repeating itself is not so much of a meaningless
cliché. Camille
Paglia reports on the primaries for Salon:
"Although
the chaotically open primary has given Candidate A
a numerical victory, Candidate B will surely be the
party nominee in this year's general election. Candidate
A's cult followers in the Northeastern
media still look stunned from his embarrassing loss
to Candidate
B last weekend. What fun it was to watch them squirm
and pout as they tried by rote to blame Candidate A's
defeat
on "negative ads"..."
But
she's not talking about the 2008 primaries. It's the
2000 Republican primary and Candidate A is John McCain.
Candidate B? What Paglia refers to as that "inarticulate
lightweight" Texas Governor. Not sure if irony
is the appropriate word, but it's certainly weird to
see Obama's campaign following the same trajectory
and suffering the same cultic
smears today
as McCain's
did back in 2000.
But for Obama "Cultists" Paglia offers a shred
of comfort from 8-years thither. Apparently "Like
it or not, with few exceptions, the
taller
presidential candidate always wins." (N.B: Obama:
6'2", McBush: 5'7") (Link
to this)
HALL
AND OATES AND HILLARY: SOUNDTRACK FOR THE BEIGE REVOLUTION
March
6, 2008
Why
is Clinton still there? Why are we so determined to reject
change? What do Hall and Oates have to do with
anything?

Don't
get me wrong, I think "Say No Go" was a great
song. Even though Hall and Oates' brand of nerdish pop-soul
is a text-book example of muzak for folks who don't 'get'
music and are turned off by passion and edginess, it's
hard to hate them cuz they were just so infectious. Kinda
like the Three's Company sig tune, athlete's foot or Snoop
Dogg's made-up words.
Hall and Oates were the soundtrack to sales office holiday
parties. They made songs for cheap-suited bald guys to knead
office administrator rear end to; tunes for toner salesmen
to hum between bouts of bored roadside masturbation in
their
company Hyundais; for people who choose beige because taupe
is too edgy; for holiday drinkers who get wasted bi-annually
and robot dance their way through Tina Turner's entire back
catalog; for people who lock their doors when they pass anyone
black and under 40; for people who always ask for mild
sauce... In short, Hall and Oates are for people who
fear the activity of living and treat passion with suspicion.
They are for people who prefer to live out their years
in comfy states of non-committal leaving every
envelope
unpushed
and every
thought firmly within the box.
So where am I going with this Hall and Oates crap? It's my
analogy for the otherwise inexplicable phenomenon of Hillary
Clinton's enduring popularity. She is the political equivalent
of Hall and Oates: bland, well-executed fodder for people
who are turned off by genuine passion. Sure, she can turn
out some catchy tunes. But they are completely devoid of
edge, grit, soul, innovation, risk or anything else that
makes things interesting. Clinton's politics is muzak for
people who don't like politics.
You vote McCain because you don't care if the whole world
goes to hell as long as you pay lower taxes. You vote Obama
if you're morally opposed to injustice and are impatient
for change. You vote Clinton because she cried at a rally
once. Oh, that and you "weally, weally want a woman
to be president." While McBush and Obama represent the
people with passionately-held, deep-rooted political beliefs
(messed-up or not), Clinton represents only the triumph
of vacuousness.
I respect McCain more than Clinton. There, I said
it. With all his warmongering bluster, Bushco-backing and
unashamed nastiness, he is at least sincere about his insincerity.
And, however foul, icky and injurious to the common good
they might be, McBush's beliefs have substance. What does
Clinton represent that's worthy of respect? The ability to
cry on cue like a Tiny Tears doll? The ability to pass off
days spent choosing drapes for the White House while
her husband got oral from skanks as experience?
She might be presenting her recent wins in Texas and Ohio
as victories, but she's lost the war. She's more likely to
run as McBush's veep than beat him. So why is the DNC betraying
the people again by allowing the pointless in-fighting to
continue? Grow them cojones back Howard and put a stop to
it. Let the people who actually care about music choose the
next
song instead of ceding momentum to those Clinton-loving clones
clamoring for Hall and Oates. Our ears are bleeding from
8 years of Bush-Cheney Death Metal and "Say No
Go" ain't gonna cut it. (Link
to this)

TROLLING
FOR 'MERIKA
March
1,
2008

Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad has a blog. Style-wise,
it's not exactly Rolling Stone - more Hewell Hauser popping
tranquilizers with the guy who writes IRS forms - but the
comments section is a weird trip.
Amazingly, the president
of Iran doesn't believe in screening (take a tip Townhall.com,
you bunch of pussies!), so there's
a great opportunity here for American cuntservatives to do
their bit for international relations and speak directly
to a foreign head of state with whom they share many misunderstandings
and disagreements. Here are some choice comments by American
visitors that should make every patriot swell with pride:
"Shut up please, would you? I get headache reading your
nonsense stuff."
"I hope someone puts a bullet in your head very soon."
"Die slow."
"You are a n***er."
Interesting
to see Obama's ideas about talking to our 'enemies' gaining
exceptance on the right. (Link
to this)
Back
Pages
Fried
Wire Policy and Disclaimer | Hatemail | Hmm... | Fanmail |
 |